Financhill
Sell
16

PCCE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$10.56
Seasonality move :
--
Day range:
$10.56 - $10.56
52-week range:
$9.35 - $14.05
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-- -- -- -- --
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-- -- -- -- --
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
-- -- -- -- --
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
$10.56 -- -- -- $0.21 0% --
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
$22.13 -- -- -- $0.57 2.55% --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
$28.03 -- -- -- $0.09 1.82% --
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
$28.79 -- -- -- $0.45 1.86% --
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
$19.17 -- -- -- $0.48 2.49% --
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
$43.87 -- -- -- $0.89 2.47% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
-- 0.000 -- --
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
-- 1.311 -- --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-- 1.759 -- --
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-- 1.187 -- --
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
-- 1.347 -- --
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-- 1.361 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Polen Capital China Growth ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PCCE or CGRO?

    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- --
    CGRO
    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCE or CGRO?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    0 0 0
    CGRO
    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCE or CGRO More Risky?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or CGRO?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or CGRO?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CGRO
    CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCE or CXSE?

    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- --
    CXSE
    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCE or CXSE?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    0 0 0
    CXSE
    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCE or CXSE More Risky?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.373%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or CXSE?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or CXSE?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CXSE
    WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCE or FXI?

    iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- --
    FXI
    iShares China Large-Cap ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCE or FXI?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    0 0 0
    FXI
    iShares China Large-Cap ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCE or FXI More Risky?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.755%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or FXI?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or FXI?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FXI
    iShares China Large-Cap ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCE or KALL?

    KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- --
    KALL
    KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCE or KALL?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    0 0 0
    KALL
    KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCE or KALL More Risky?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.612%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or KALL?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or KALL?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
    KALL
    KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns PCCE or MCHI?

    iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net margin of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- --
    MCHI
    iShares MSCI China ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About PCCE or MCHI?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polen Capital China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe Polen Capital China Growth ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    0 0 0
    MCHI
    iShares MSCI China ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is PCCE or MCHI More Risky?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.867%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCCE or MCHI?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PCCE or MCHI?

    Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Polen Capital China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polen Capital China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PCCE
    Polen Capital China Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --
    MCHI
    iShares MSCI China ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Target a Dividend King?
Is Target a Dividend King?

Popular retail giant Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT) has been in a…

Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?

There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…

3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On

Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…

Stock Ideas

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x

Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
61
ITCI alert for Jan 14

Intra-Cellular Therapies [ITCI] is down 0.26% over the past day.

Sell
30
ESTA alert for Jan 14

Establishment Labs Holdings [ESTA] is down 1.51% over the past day.

Buy
72
DJT alert for Jan 14

Trump Media & Technology Group [DJT] is down 8.25% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock