Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
Sell
12
CGRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.13
Seasonality move
:
1.49%
Day range:
$22.13 - $22.13
52-week range:
$17.88 - $28.57
Dividend yield:
2.55%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
13%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
$22.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.57 | 2.55% | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
$25.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.16% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$28.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.82% | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
$19.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.49% | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
$20.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.4% | -- |
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
$10.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.311 | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | 2.016 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.759 | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | 1.347 | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | 1.642 | -- | -- |
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRO or CNXT?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net margin of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRO or CNXT?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck ChiNext ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck ChiNext ETF, analysts believe CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is more attractive than VanEck ChiNext ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRO or CNXT More Risky?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.869%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRO or CNXT?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. VanEck ChiNext ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRO or CNXT?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of --. Notably, CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck ChiNext ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck ChiNext ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRO or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net margin of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRO or CXSE?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is CGRO or CXSE More Risky?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.373%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRO or CXSE?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRO or CXSE?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRO or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net margin of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRO or KALL?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF, analysts believe CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRO or KALL More Risky?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRO or KALL?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRO or KALL?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRO or MCH?
Matthews China Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net margin of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Matthews China Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRO or MCH?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews China Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Matthews China Active ETF, analysts believe CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is more attractive than Matthews China Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 MCHMatthews China Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRO or MCH More Risky?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews China Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRO or MCH?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Matthews China Active ETF offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews China Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRO or MCH?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Matthews China Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Matthews China Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews China Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Matthews China Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- MCHMatthews China Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGRO or PCCE?
Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net margin of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's return on equity of -- beat Polen Capital China Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGRO or PCCE?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polen Capital China Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has higher upside potential than Polen Capital China Growth ETF, analysts believe CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is more attractive than Polen Capital China Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF0 0 0 PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGRO or PCCE More Risky?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polen Capital China Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGRO or PCCE?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Polen Capital China Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polen Capital China Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGRO or PCCE?
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Polen Capital China Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's net income of -- is lower than Polen Capital China Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Polen Capital China Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF is -- versus -- for Polen Capital China Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGROCoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF-- -- -- -- PCCEPolen Capital China Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Why Did Buffett Sell So Much Last Year?
In 2024, value investing legend Warren Buffett did the seemingly…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
61
ITCI alert for Jan 14
Intra-Cellular Therapies [ITCI] is down 0.26% over the past day.
Sell
30
ESTA alert for Jan 14
Establishment Labs Holdings [ESTA] is down 1.51% over the past day.
Buy
72
DJT alert for Jan 14
Trump Media & Technology Group [DJT] is down 8.25% over the past day.
