TRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 6.81%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 12.81%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.44%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $49.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.51%. Given that Greenbrier Companies has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Greenbrier Companies is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.747% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.159%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $762.1M. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $51.9M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.65x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 7.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.75x versus 0.41x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manitowoc has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of -1.34%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.44%. On the other hand Manitowoc has an analysts' consensus of $11.05 which suggests that it could grow by 6.97%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than Manitowoc, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than Manitowoc.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.747% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manitowoc has a beta of 1.916, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.58%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Manitowoc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Manitowoc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are larger than Manitowoc quarterly revenues of $470.9M. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is higher than Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.65x while Manitowoc's PE ratio is 8.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.75x versus 0.17x for Manitowoc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FreightCar America has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 52.39%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat FreightCar America's return on equity of --.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.44%. On the other hand FreightCar America has an analysts' consensus of $11.83 which suggests that it could grow by 70.51%. Given that FreightCar America has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe FreightCar America is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.747% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FreightCar America has a beta of 1.729, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.883%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. FreightCar America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. FreightCar America pays out -36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are larger than FreightCar America quarterly revenues of $96.3M. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is lower than FreightCar America's net income of $50.4M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.65x while FreightCar America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.75x versus 0.45x for FreightCar America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 12.34%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.66%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 8.44%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $211.36 which suggests that it could grow by 6.04%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.747% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.32%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $322M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.65x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 31.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.75x versus 3.29x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.