SHEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Shell PLC's net margin of 16.2%. Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62% beat ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57%.

Shell PLC has a consensus price target of $74.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand ConocoPhillips has an analysts' consensus of $125.69 which suggests that it could grow by 45.5%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Shell PLC has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.992%.

Shell PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. ConocoPhillips offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Shell PLC pays 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shell PLC quarterly revenues are $66.3B, which are larger than ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Shell PLC's net income of $928M is lower than ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Shell PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.37x while ConocoPhillips's PE ratio is 11.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shell PLC is 0.71x versus 1.86x for ConocoPhillips. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chevron has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Shell PLC's net margin of 6.7%. Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Shell PLC has a consensus price target of $74.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $175.54 which suggests that it could grow by 29.43%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Shell PLC has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.764%.

Shell PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Shell PLC pays 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shell PLC quarterly revenues are $66.3B, which are larger than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Shell PLC's net income of $928M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Shell PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.37x while Chevron's PE ratio is 13.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shell PLC is 0.71x versus 1.27x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinor ASA has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Shell PLC's net margin of 7.52%. Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62% beat Equinor ASA's return on equity of 19.23%.

Shell PLC has a consensus price target of $74.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand Equinor ASA has an analysts' consensus of $28.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.65%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Shell PLC has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.49%.

Shell PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. Equinor ASA offers a yield of 6.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Shell PLC pays 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 97.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shell PLC quarterly revenues are $66.3B, which are larger than Equinor ASA quarterly revenues of $26.5B. Shell PLC's net income of $928M is lower than Equinor ASA's net income of $2B. Notably, Shell PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.37x while Equinor ASA's PE ratio is 7.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shell PLC is 0.71x versus 0.64x for Equinor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TotalEnergies SE has a net margin of 1.4% compared to Shell PLC's net margin of 8.4%. Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62% beat TotalEnergies SE's return on equity of 13.14%.

Shell PLC has a consensus price target of $74.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand TotalEnergies SE has an analysts' consensus of $69.28 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that TotalEnergies SE has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe TotalEnergies SE is more attractive than Shell PLC.

Shell PLC has a beta of 0.273, which suggesting that the stock is 72.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TotalEnergies SE has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.262%.

Shell PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.48%. TotalEnergies SE offers a yield of 6.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Shell PLC pays 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. TotalEnergies SE pays out 48.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shell PLC quarterly revenues are $66.3B, which are larger than TotalEnergies SE quarterly revenues of $47.1B. Shell PLC's net income of $928M is lower than TotalEnergies SE's net income of $4B. Notably, Shell PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.37x while TotalEnergies SE's PE ratio is 8.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shell PLC is 0.71x versus 0.67x for TotalEnergies SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.