SDRL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Corp (bry) has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Seadrill's net margin of 37.9%. Seadrill's return on equity of 13.94% beat Berry Corp (bry)'s return on equity of 11.74%.

Seadrill has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.4%. On the other hand Berry Corp (bry) has an analysts' consensus of $6.34 which suggests that it could grow by 46.76%. Given that Berry Corp (bry) has higher upside potential than Seadrill, analysts believe Berry Corp (bry) is more attractive than Seadrill.

Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Corp (bry) has a beta of 1.644, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.418%.

Seadrill has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Berry Corp (bry) offers a yield of 13.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Seadrill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Corp (bry) pays out 209.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

Seadrill quarterly revenues are $354M, which are larger than Berry Corp (bry) quarterly revenues of $184.4M. Seadrill's net income of $32M is lower than Berry Corp (bry)'s net income of $69.9M. Notably, Seadrill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Berry Corp (bry)'s PE ratio is 4.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seadrill is 1.89x versus 0.42x for Berry Corp (bry). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Seadrill's net margin of 10.88%. Seadrill's return on equity of 13.94% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 12.2%.

Seadrill has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.4%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $40.86 which suggests that it could grow by 23.54%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.18%.

Seadrill has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Seadrill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seadrill quarterly revenues are $354M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $693.8M. Seadrill's net income of $32M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Seadrill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 9.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seadrill is 1.89x versus 1.19x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Seadrill's net margin of -7.34%. Seadrill's return on equity of 13.94% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Seadrill has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.4%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could fall by -30.07%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 253.637%.

Seadrill has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seadrill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seadrill quarterly revenues are $354M, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $138.2M. Seadrill's net income of $32M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Seadrill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seadrill is 1.89x versus 0.09x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 9.04% compared to Seadrill's net margin of -72.12%. Seadrill's return on equity of 13.94% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89%.

Seadrill has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.4%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.17%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.534%.

Seadrill has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Seadrill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Seadrill quarterly revenues are $354M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Seadrill's net income of $32M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M. Notably, Seadrill's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seadrill is 1.89x versus 0.60x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.