BATL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 47.78% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of 8.09%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 37.8% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1424.59%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $29.53 which suggests that it could grow by 49.31%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.45500000000001%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 6.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $45.3M, which are smaller than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $677.3M. Battalion Oil's net income of $21.6M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 6.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.10x versus 0.71x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of 47.78% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of 10.42%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 37.8% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.6%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1424.59%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.91 which suggests that it could grow by 76.76%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Noble Corp PLC, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Noble Corp PLC.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 9.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $45.3M, which are smaller than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $927.3M. Battalion Oil's net income of $21.6M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $96.6M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 6.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.10x versus 0.98x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 47.78% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of -4.44%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 37.8% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1424.59%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $9.97 which suggests that it could grow by 69.5%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.906%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 5.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $45.3M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Battalion Oil's net income of $21.6M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.10x versus 0.43x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of 47.78% compared to Battalion Oil's net margin of 34.95%. Battalion Oil's return on equity of 37.8% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 15.07%.

Battalion Oil has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1424.59%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $48.63 which suggests that it could grow by 141.68%. Given that Battalion Oil has higher upside potential than Seadrill, analysts believe Battalion Oil is more attractive than Seadrill.

Battalion Oil has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.213% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Battalion Oil has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Battalion Oil pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Battalion Oil quarterly revenues are $45.3M, which are smaller than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $289M. Battalion Oil's net income of $21.6M is lower than Seadrill's net income of $101M. Notably, Battalion Oil's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seadrill's PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Battalion Oil is 0.10x versus 1.02x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.