RY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 30.68% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 29.5%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 14.32% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $125.66, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.48%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.609%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.6B is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $11M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.79x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 3.68x versus 3.05x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citigroup has a net margin of 30.68% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 14.58%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 14.32% beat Citigroup's return on equity of 6.09%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $125.66, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Citigroup has an analysts' consensus of $90.03 which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that Citigroup has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Citigroup is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citigroup has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.912%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Citigroup offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Citigroup pays out 41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are smaller than Citigroup quarterly revenues of $19.6B. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.6B is higher than Citigroup's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.79x while Citigroup's PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 3.68x versus 1.71x for Citigroup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 30.68% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 20.42%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 14.32% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $125.66, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 29.43%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.6B is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.79x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 17.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 3.68x versus 3.10x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 30.68% compared to Royal Bank of Canada's net margin of 28.72%. Royal Bank of Canada's return on equity of 14.32% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $125.66, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $173.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Royal Bank of Canada, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Royal Bank of Canada.

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 17.927% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

Royal Bank of Canada has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Park National offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Royal Bank of Canada pays 40.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Royal Bank of Canada quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Royal Bank of Canada's net income of $3.6B is higher than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Royal Bank of Canada's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.79x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Bank of Canada is 3.68x versus 4.75x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.