OLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -17.13%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.13%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Olo.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 448.50x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.07x versus 3.05x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of 12.23%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.9%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $12.13 which suggests that it could fall by -3.66%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than UiPath.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $423.6M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is lower than UiPath's net income of $51.8M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 448.50x while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.07x versus 4.93x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toast has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of 4.19%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Toast's return on equity of 11.09%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $42.92 which suggests that it could fall by -3.91%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than Toast.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Olo's net income of $1.8M is lower than Toast's net income of $56M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 448.50x while Toast's PE ratio is 194.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.07x versus 5.30x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -2.12%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 5.91%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 107.76%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Olo.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 448.50x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.07x versus 0.24x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.