OLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of -0.84% compared to Olo's net margin of -1.26%. Olo's return on equity of -0.14% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $8.70, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.53%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Olo.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $76.1M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Olo's net income of -$635K is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 4.21x versus 3.46x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of -0.84% compared to Olo's net margin of 12.23%. Olo's return on equity of -0.14% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.9%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $8.70, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $12.31 which suggests that it could grow by 1.33%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than UiPath.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $76.1M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $423.6M. Olo's net income of -$635K is lower than UiPath's net income of $51.8M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 4.21x versus 4.69x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toast has a net margin of -0.84% compared to Olo's net margin of 2.39%. Olo's return on equity of -0.14% beat Toast's return on equity of 1.43%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $8.70, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $40.96 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than Toast.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $76.1M, which are smaller than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Olo's net income of -$635K is lower than Toast's net income of $32M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Toast's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 4.21x versus 4.39x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -0.84% compared to Olo's net margin of -1.23%. Olo's return on equity of -0.14% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $8.70, signalling upside risk potential of 19.51%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.3%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Olo.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $76.1M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Olo's net income of -$635K is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 4.21x versus 0.30x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.