PATH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of -3% compared to UiPath's net margin of 10.74%. UiPath's return on equity of -4.78% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $15.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.78%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $354.7M, which are larger than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $169.6M. UiPath's net income of -$10.7M is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 53.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 5.25x versus 5.43x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabre has a net margin of -3% compared to UiPath's net margin of -8.22%. UiPath's return on equity of -4.78% beat Sabre's return on equity of --.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $15.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.78%. On the other hand Sabre has an analysts' consensus of $4.31 which suggests that it could grow by 21.35%. Given that Sabre has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe Sabre is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabre has a beta of 1.799, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.894%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabre offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sabre pays out -3.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $354.7M, which are smaller than Sabre quarterly revenues of $764.7M. UiPath's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Sabre's net income of -$62.8M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sabre's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 5.25x versus 0.48x for Sabre. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -3% compared to UiPath's net margin of -1.23%. UiPath's return on equity of -4.78% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $15.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.78%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $354.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. UiPath's net income of -$10.7M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 5.25x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -3% compared to UiPath's net margin of -6.48%. UiPath's return on equity of -4.78% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55%.

UiPath has a consensus price target of $15.18, signalling upside risk potential of 19.78%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 101.54%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than UiPath.

UiPath has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UiPath has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UiPath pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UiPath quarterly revenues are $354.7M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $268.3M. UiPath's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, UiPath's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UiPath is 5.25x versus 3.64x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.