OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -0.13%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 11.15%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $15.80 which suggests that it could grow by 45.62%. Given that Core Laboratories has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Core Laboratories is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.586%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $123.6M. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of -$154K. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.71x versus 1.00x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diversified Energy Co PLC has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of --. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Diversified Energy Co PLC's return on equity of -16.44%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Diversified Energy Co PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.47%. Given that Diversified Energy Co PLC has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Diversified Energy Co PLC is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diversified Energy Co PLC has a beta of 0.651, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.863%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diversified Energy Co PLC offers a yield of 8.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diversified Energy Co PLC pays out -95.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Diversified Energy Co PLC quarterly revenues of --. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than Diversified Energy Co PLC's net income of --. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while Diversified Energy Co PLC's PE ratio is 6.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.71x versus 0.85x for Diversified Energy Co PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 3.77%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $29.12 which suggests that it could grow by 46.23%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.638%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.71x versus 0.77x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of --. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.16%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.287%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.67x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.71x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.