OHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Prologis has a net margin of 39.39% compared to Omega Healthcare Investors's net margin of 27.71%. Omega Healthcare Investors's return on equity of 10.34% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a consensus price target of $40.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $117.15 which suggests that it could grow by 9.78%. Given that Prologis has higher upside potential than Omega Healthcare Investors, analysts believe Prologis is more attractive than Omega Healthcare Investors.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.051%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Omega Healthcare Investors pays 168.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Omega Healthcare Investors's is not.

Omega Healthcare Investors quarterly revenues are $276.8M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Omega Healthcare Investors's net income of $109M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, Omega Healthcare Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while Prologis's PE ratio is 26.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Healthcare Investors is 9.51x versus 12.13x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tanger has a net margin of 39.39% compared to Omega Healthcare Investors's net margin of 14.19%. Omega Healthcare Investors's return on equity of 10.34% beat Tanger's return on equity of 15.44%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a consensus price target of $40.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Tanger has an analysts' consensus of $35.44 which suggests that it could grow by 19.95%. Given that Tanger has higher upside potential than Omega Healthcare Investors, analysts believe Tanger is more attractive than Omega Healthcare Investors.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tanger has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.101%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Tanger offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Omega Healthcare Investors pays 168.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Tanger pays out 121.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Healthcare Investors quarterly revenues are $276.8M, which are larger than Tanger quarterly revenues of $135.4M. Omega Healthcare Investors's net income of $109M is higher than Tanger's net income of $19.2M. Notably, Omega Healthcare Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while Tanger's PE ratio is 35.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Healthcare Investors is 9.51x versus 6.15x for Tanger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Service Properties Trust has a net margin of 39.39% compared to Omega Healthcare Investors's net margin of -26.76%. Omega Healthcare Investors's return on equity of 10.34% beat Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -33.8%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a consensus price target of $40.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Service Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $2.33 which suggests that it could grow by 1.01%. Given that Omega Healthcare Investors has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe Omega Healthcare Investors is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.774, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.36%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Service Properties Trust offers a yield of 9.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Omega Healthcare Investors pays 168.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Properties Trust pays out -36.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Omega Healthcare Investors quarterly revenues are $276.8M, which are smaller than Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $435.2M. Omega Healthcare Investors's net income of $109M is higher than Service Properties Trust's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Omega Healthcare Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while Service Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Healthcare Investors is 9.51x versus 0.20x for Service Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of 39.39% compared to Omega Healthcare Investors's net margin of 10.8%. Omega Healthcare Investors's return on equity of 10.34% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.46%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a consensus price target of $40.43, signalling upside risk potential of 9.68%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $166.55 which suggests that it could grow by 9.24%. Given that Omega Healthcare Investors has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe Omega Healthcare Investors is more attractive than Welltower.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.731, which suggesting that the stock is 26.872% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.67%.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.27%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Omega Healthcare Investors pays 168.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Healthcare Investors quarterly revenues are $276.8M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Omega Healthcare Investors's net income of $109M is lower than Welltower's net income of $258M. Notably, Omega Healthcare Investors's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.89x while Welltower's PE ratio is 87.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Healthcare Investors is 9.51x versus 11.38x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.