SVC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Street Properties has a net margin of -9.55% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of -52.63%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -21.72% beat Franklin Street Properties's return on equity of -5.84%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89.02%. On the other hand Franklin Street Properties has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Service Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Franklin Street Properties, analysts believe Service Properties Trust is more attractive than Franklin Street Properties.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 2.191, which suggesting that the stock is 119.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Street Properties has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.841%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.8%. Franklin Street Properties offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -404.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Street Properties pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $491.2M, which are larger than Franklin Street Properties quarterly revenues of $29.7M. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M is lower than Franklin Street Properties's net income of -$15.6M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Street Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.22x versus 1.55x for Franklin Street Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a net margin of -9.55% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of -47.54%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -21.72% beat Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89.02%. On the other hand Hudson Pacific Properties has an analysts' consensus of $6.08 which suggests that it could grow by 62.08%. Given that Service Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Hudson Pacific Properties, analysts believe Service Properties Trust is more attractive than Hudson Pacific Properties.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 2.191, which suggesting that the stock is 119.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.259%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.8%. Hudson Pacific Properties offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -404.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Hudson Pacific Properties pays out -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $491.2M, which are larger than Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues of $200.4M. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M is higher than Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hudson Pacific Properties's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.22x versus 0.50x for Hudson Pacific Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of -9.55% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of 6.22%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -21.72% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 10.4%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89.02%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $20.47 which suggests that it could grow by 12.36%. Given that Service Properties Trust has higher upside potential than Host Hotels & Resorts, analysts believe Service Properties Trust is more attractive than Host Hotels & Resorts.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 2.191, which suggesting that the stock is 119.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.067%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.8%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -404.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 73.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $491.2M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M is lower than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $82M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.22x versus 2.31x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

J. W. Mays has a net margin of -9.55% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of 0.48%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -21.72% beat J. W. Mays's return on equity of -0.35%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 89.02%. On the other hand J. W. Mays has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Service Properties Trust has higher upside potential than J. W. Mays, analysts believe Service Properties Trust is more attractive than J. W. Mays.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 2.191, which suggesting that the stock is 119.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison J. W. Mays has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.31%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.8%. J. W. Mays offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -404.01% of its earnings as a dividend. J. W. Mays pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $491.2M, which are larger than J. W. Mays quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M is lower than J. W. Mays's net income of $26.7K. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while J. W. Mays's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.22x versus 4.07x for J. W. Mays. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.