MMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Maximus's net margin of 6.88%. Maximus's return on equity of 17.12% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 12.06%.

Maximus has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.8%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of $175.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

Maximus has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.525%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $898.3M. Maximus's net income of $96.6M is higher than FTI Consulting's net income of $61.8M. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 22.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.81x versus 1.58x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Maximus's net margin of 6.07%. Maximus's return on equity of 17.12% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 23.92%.

Maximus has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.8%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $170.75 which suggests that it could grow by 22.64%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Maximus has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.9%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $404.1M. Maximus's net income of $96.6M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $24.5M. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 20.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.81x versus 1.64x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Maximus's net margin of 5.51%. Maximus's return on equity of 17.12% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.46%.

Maximus has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.8%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $102.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.1%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than ICF International, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than ICF International.

Maximus has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.909%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $487.6M. Maximus's net income of $96.6M is higher than ICF International's net income of $26.9M. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while ICF International's PE ratio is 14.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.81x versus 0.79x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Initio has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Maximus's net margin of --. Maximus's return on equity of 17.12% beat Initio's return on equity of --.

Maximus has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.8%. On the other hand Initio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Initio, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Initio.

Maximus has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio has a beta of 0.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.383%.

Maximus has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.65%. Initio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maximus pays 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maximus quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Initio quarterly revenues of --. Maximus's net income of $96.6M is higher than Initio's net income of --. Notably, Maximus's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.44x while Initio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maximus is 0.81x versus -- for Initio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.