FCN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CRA International has a net margin of 6.88% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 9.9%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 12.06% beat CRA International's return on equity of 24.33%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $176.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand CRA International has an analysts' consensus of $235.50 which suggests that it could grow by 38.82%. Given that CRA International has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe CRA International is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRA International has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.362%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRA International offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International pays out 26.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CRA International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $898.3M, which are larger than CRA International quarterly revenues of $181.9M. FTI Consulting's net income of $61.8M is higher than CRA International's net income of $18M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while CRA International's PE ratio is 22.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.62x versus 1.67x for CRA International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 6.88% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 6.07%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 12.06% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 23.92%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $176.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $170.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that Huron Consulting Group has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Huron Consulting Group is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.9%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $898.3M, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $404.1M. FTI Consulting's net income of $61.8M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $24.5M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 22.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.62x versus 1.75x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 6.88% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 5.51%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 12.06% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.46%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $176.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.53%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.909%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $898.3M, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $487.6M. FTI Consulting's net income of $61.8M is higher than ICF International's net income of $26.9M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while ICF International's PE ratio is 13.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.62x versus 0.76x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 6.88% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 2.94%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 12.06% beat Maximus's return on equity of 16.11%.

FTI Consulting has a consensus price target of $176.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of $102.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.96%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.525% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.485%.

FTI Consulting has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. FTI Consulting pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTI Consulting quarterly revenues are $898.3M, which are smaller than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.4B. FTI Consulting's net income of $61.8M is higher than Maximus's net income of $41.2M. Notably, FTI Consulting's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.77x while Maximus's PE ratio is 14.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTI Consulting is 1.62x versus 0.75x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.