MFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 10.51%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 10.22% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.84%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $27.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.47%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 67.69%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manulife Financial pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manulife Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $44.1M. Manulife Financial's net income of $387.3M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.71x versus 4.86x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of -11.55%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 10.22% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $27.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.47%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.38 which suggests that it could grow by 4.26%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manulife Financial pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Manulife Financial's net income of $387.3M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.71x versus 0.52x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of -2.92%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 10.22% beat Citizens's return on equity of 4.28%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $27.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.47%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.87%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.643%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manulife Financial pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manulife Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Citizens quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Manulife Financial's net income of $387.3M is higher than Citizens's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Citizens's PE ratio is 22.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.71x versus 0.81x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 4.77% compared to Manulife Financial's net margin of 3.04%. Manulife Financial's return on equity of 10.22% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 2.3%.

Manulife Financial has a consensus price target of $27.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.47%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Genworth Financial has higher upside potential than Manulife Financial, analysts believe Genworth Financial is more attractive than Manulife Financial.

Manulife Financial has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.32399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.881%.

Manulife Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Manulife Financial pays 56.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Manulife Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manulife Financial quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Manulife Financial's net income of $387.3M is higher than Genworth Financial's net income of $54M. Notably, Manulife Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 13.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manulife Financial is 1.71x versus 0.42x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.