MATX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of -16.73%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity of 4.96%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.55%. On the other hand Genco Shipping & Trading has an analysts' consensus of $20.08 which suggests that it could grow by 41.02%. Given that Genco Shipping & Trading has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.623%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Genco Shipping & Trading offers a yield of 10.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 88.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are larger than Genco Shipping & Trading quarterly revenues of $71.3M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is higher than Genco Shipping & Trading's net income of -$11.9M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Genco Shipping & Trading's PE ratio is 13.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.14x versus 1.62x for Genco Shipping & Trading. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirby has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of 9.67%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Kirby's return on equity of 8.84%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.55%. On the other hand Kirby has an analysts' consensus of $126.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.97%. Given that Matson has higher upside potential than Kirby, analysts believe Matson is more attractive than Kirby.

Matson has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirby has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.806%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Kirby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are smaller than Kirby quarterly revenues of $785.7M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is lower than Kirby's net income of $76M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Kirby's PE ratio is 21.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.14x versus 1.97x for Kirby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of -1.61%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions's return on equity of 3.67%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.55%. On the other hand Pangaea Logistics Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $9.28 which suggests that it could grow by 110.03%. Given that Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Pangaea Logistics Solutions is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.463%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions offers a yield of 9.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 64.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are larger than Pangaea Logistics Solutions quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is higher than Pangaea Logistics Solutions's net income of -$2M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Pangaea Logistics Solutions's PE ratio is 13.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.14x versus 0.40x for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seacor Marine Holdings has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Matson's net margin of -27.91%. Matson's return on equity of 20.32% beat Seacor Marine Holdings's return on equity of -22.13%.

Matson has a consensus price target of $142.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.55%. On the other hand Seacor Marine Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 157.43%. Given that Seacor Marine Holdings has higher upside potential than Matson, analysts believe Seacor Marine Holdings is more attractive than Matson.

Matson has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seacor Marine Holdings has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.007%.

Matson has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Seacor Marine Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matson pays 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Seacor Marine Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matson quarterly revenues are $782M, which are larger than Seacor Marine Holdings quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Matson's net income of $72.3M is higher than Seacor Marine Holdings's net income of -$15.5M. Notably, Matson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Seacor Marine Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matson is 1.14x versus 0.53x for Seacor Marine Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.