CHRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forward Air has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -8.26%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -158.26%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 93.24%. Given that Forward Air has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Forward Air is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.866%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $613.3M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.19x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.93%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.27%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $38.73 which suggests that it could grow by 14.9%. Given that Hub Group has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Hub Group is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.054%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $915.2M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Hub Group's net income of $26.8M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.53x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 7.18%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Pitney Bowes's return on equity of --.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Pitney Bowes has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.73%. Given that Pitney Bowes has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Pitney Bowes is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.41%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Pitney Bowes offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out -17.66% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Pitney Bowes quarterly revenues of $493.4M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Pitney Bowes's net income of $35.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Pitney Bowes's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.82x for Pitney Bowes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 1.19%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.33%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.