Financhill
Buy
65

CHRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$95.41
Seasonality move :
3.55%
Day range:
$95.38 - $97.53
52-week range:
$82.16 - $114.82
Dividend yield:
2.58%
P/E ratio:
22.87x
P/S ratio:
0.67x
P/B ratio:
6.54x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
1.4M
1-year change:
11.1%
Market cap:
$11.3B
Revenue:
$17.7B
EPS (TTM):
$4.18

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
$4.2B $1.05 -7.27% 10.61% $109.21
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
$2.5B $1.37 -0.48% -0.87% $107.57
FWRD
Forward Air
$617.2M -$0.48 -2.44% -99.01% $32.00
HUBG
Hub Group
$963.5M $0.43 -7.18% -6.86% $38.73
PBI
Pitney Bowes
$497.9M $0.27 -39.96% -92.86% $17.00
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
$194M $0.04 8.79% -25% $9.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
$95.58 $109.21 $11.3B 22.87x $0.62 2.58% 0.67x
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
$112.13 $107.57 $15.4B 18.63x $0.73 1.3% 1.42x
FWRD
Forward Air
$16.56 $32.00 $503.8M 9.40x $0.24 0% 0.19x
HUBG
Hub Group
$33.71 $38.73 $2.1B 19.83x $0.13 1.48% 0.53x
PBI
Pitney Bowes
$10.32 $17.00 $1.9B -- $0.07 2.23% 0.82x
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
$6.00 $9.50 $282.9M 17.14x $0.00 0% 0.33x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
44.48% 1.294 11.41% 1.24x
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
-- 0.850 -- 1.62x
FWRD
Forward Air
91.65% 2.020 248.19% 1.03x
HUBG
Hub Group
13.26% 2.337 10.84% 1.25x
PBI
Pitney Bowes
138.91% 2.618 115.83% 0.69x
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
6.43% 1.919 5.17% 1.41x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
$324.5M $176.9M 16.21% 31.61% 4.37% $90.4M
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
$352.9M $265.9M 37.55% 37.55% 9.97% $329.5M
FWRD
Forward Air
$75.3M $4.8M -36.65% -158.26% 0.64% $15.7M
HUBG
Hub Group
$75.3M $37.3M 5.34% 6.27% 4.25% $50.8M
PBI
Pitney Bowes
$269.1M $96.6M -10.67% -- 14.39% -$33.6M
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
$32.8M $3.8M 7.97% 8.09% 1.61% -$6.4M

C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CHRW or EXPD?

    Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 7.64%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 37.55%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    8.02% $1.11 $3.1B
    EXPD
    Expeditors International of Washington
    13.23% $1.47 $2.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHRW or EXPD?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Expeditors International of Washington has an analysts' consensus of $107.57 which suggests that it could fall by -4.07%. Given that C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    11 11 1
    EXPD
    Expeditors International of Washington
    0 10 3
  • Is CHRW or EXPD More Risky?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.51%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or EXPD?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Expeditors International of Washington offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 25.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or EXPD?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues of $2.7B. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is lower than Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $203.8M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Expeditors International of Washington's PE ratio is 18.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 1.42x for Expeditors International of Washington. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    0.67x 22.87x $4B $135.3M
    EXPD
    Expeditors International of Washington
    1.42x 18.63x $2.7B $203.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns CHRW or FWRD?

    Forward Air has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -8.26%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -158.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    8.02% $1.11 $3.1B
    FWRD
    Forward Air
    12.28% -$1.68 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHRW or FWRD?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 93.24%. Given that Forward Air has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Forward Air is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    11 11 1
    FWRD
    Forward Air
    2 4 0
  • Is CHRW or FWRD More Risky?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.866%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or FWRD?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or FWRD?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $613.3M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.19x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    0.67x 22.87x $4B $135.3M
    FWRD
    Forward Air
    0.19x 9.40x $613.3M -$50.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CHRW or HUBG?

    Hub Group has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.93%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    8.02% $1.11 $3.1B
    HUBG
    Hub Group
    8.23% $0.44 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHRW or HUBG?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $38.73 which suggests that it could grow by 14.9%. Given that Hub Group has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Hub Group is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    11 11 1
    HUBG
    Hub Group
    4 11 0
  • Is CHRW or HUBG More Risky?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.054%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or HUBG?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or HUBG?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $915.2M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Hub Group's net income of $26.8M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.53x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    0.67x 22.87x $4B $135.3M
    HUBG
    Hub Group
    0.53x 19.83x $915.2M $26.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns CHRW or PBI?

    Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 7.18%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Pitney Bowes's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    8.02% $1.11 $3.1B
    PBI
    Pitney Bowes
    54.54% $0.19 $1.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About CHRW or PBI?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Pitney Bowes has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.73%. Given that Pitney Bowes has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Pitney Bowes is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    11 11 1
    PBI
    Pitney Bowes
    0 1 0
  • Is CHRW or PBI More Risky?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.41%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or PBI?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Pitney Bowes offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out -17.66% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or PBI?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Pitney Bowes quarterly revenues of $493.4M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Pitney Bowes's net income of $35.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Pitney Bowes's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.82x for Pitney Bowes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    0.67x 22.87x $4B $135.3M
    PBI
    Pitney Bowes
    0.82x -- $493.4M $35.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns CHRW or RLGT?

    Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 1.19%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 8.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    8.02% $1.11 $3.1B
    RLGT
    Radiant Logistics
    15.32% $0.05 $233.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About CHRW or RLGT?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $109.21, signalling upside risk potential of 14.26%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.33%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    11 11 1
    RLGT
    Radiant Logistics
    4 0 0
  • Is CHRW or RLGT More Risky?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or RLGT?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.58%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or RLGT?

    C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $214M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $2.5M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.87x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.67x versus 0.33x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CHRW
    C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    0.67x 22.87x $4B $135.3M
    RLGT
    Radiant Logistics
    0.33x 17.14x $214M $2.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth
Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been among the top growth stocks of…

Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?
Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?

Shares of EV major Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) have experienced extreme volatility…

Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?

For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
80
SBET alert for May 29

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 66.26% over the past day.

Buy
100
BOX alert for May 29

Box [BOX] is down 0.84% over the past day.

Sell
22
OKTA alert for May 29

Okta [OKTA] is up 1.5% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock