Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Buy
59
CHRW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$88.93
Seasonality move
:
1.58%
Day range:
$88.65 - $89.99
52-week range:
$81.36 - $114.82
Dividend yield:
2.78%
P/E ratio:
21.28x
P/S ratio:
0.62x
P/B ratio:
6.09x
Volume:
709.6K
Avg. volume:
1.4M
1-year change:
9.49%
Market cap:
$10.6B
Revenue:
$17.7B
EPS (TTM):
$4.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
|
$4.2B | $1.05 | -7.27% | 10.61% | $108.76 |
|
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
|
$2.5B | $1.37 | -0.48% | -0.28% | $107.57 |
|
FWRD
Forward Air
|
$617.2M | -$0.48 | -2.22% | -99.04% | $32.00 |
|
HUBG
Hub Group
|
$963.5M | $0.43 | -5.08% | -6.23% | $38.65 |
|
PBI
Pitney Bowes
|
$497.9M | $0.27 | -39.96% | -92.86% | $17.00 |
|
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
|
$194M | $0.04 | 5.8% | 400% | $9.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
|
$88.97 | $108.76 | $10.6B | 21.28x | $0.62 | 2.78% | 0.62x |
|
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
|
$109.10 | $107.57 | $14.9B | 18.12x | $0.73 | 1.34% | 1.38x |
|
FWRD
Forward Air
|
$16.32 | $32.00 | $496.5M | 9.40x | $0.24 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
HUBG
Hub Group
|
$33.23 | $38.65 | $2B | 19.55x | $0.13 | 1.51% | 0.52x |
|
PBI
Pitney Bowes
|
$9.28 | $17.00 | $1.7B | -- | $0.06 | 2.26% | 0.74x |
|
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
|
$6.00 | $9.50 | $282.1M | 21.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.34x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
|
44.48% | 1.294 | 11.41% | 1.24x |
|
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
|
-- | 0.850 | -- | 1.62x |
|
FWRD
Forward Air
|
91.65% | 2.020 | 248.19% | 1.03x |
|
HUBG
Hub Group
|
13.26% | 2.337 | 10.84% | 1.25x |
|
PBI
Pitney Bowes
|
138.91% | 2.618 | 115.83% | 0.69x |
|
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
|
-- | 1.919 | -- | 1.34x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
|
$324.5M | $176.9M | 16.21% | 31.61% | 4.37% | $90.4M |
|
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington
|
$352.9M | $265.9M | 37.55% | 37.55% | 9.97% | $329.5M |
|
FWRD
Forward Air
|
$75.3M | $4.8M | -36.65% | -158.26% | 0.64% | $15.7M |
|
HUBG
Hub Group
|
$224.7M | $37.3M | 5.35% | 6.29% | 4.11% | $50.8M |
|
PBI
Pitney Bowes
|
$269.1M | $96.6M | -10.67% | -- | 14.39% | -$33.6M |
|
RLGT
Radiant Logistics
|
$38.7M | $8.6M | 6.61% | 6.63% | 3.4% | $14.1M |
C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHRW or EXPD?
Expeditors International of Washington has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 7.64%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Expeditors International of Washington's return on equity of 37.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide8.02% $1.11 $3.1B EXPDExpeditors International of Washington13.23% $1.47 $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CHRW or EXPD?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $108.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.24%. On the other hand Expeditors International of Washington has an analysts' consensus of $107.57 which suggests that it could fall by -1.4%. Given that C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher upside potential than Expeditors International of Washington, analysts believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more attractive than Expeditors International of Washington.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide11 11 1 EXPDExpeditors International of Washington0 10 3 -
Is CHRW or EXPD More Risky?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expeditors International of Washington has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.51%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or EXPD?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Expeditors International of Washington offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Expeditors International of Washington pays out 25.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or EXPD?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Expeditors International of Washington quarterly revenues of $2.7B. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is lower than Expeditors International of Washington's net income of $203.8M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.28x while Expeditors International of Washington's PE ratio is 18.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 1.38x for Expeditors International of Washington. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide0.62x 21.28x $4B $135.3M EXPDExpeditors International of Washington1.38x 18.12x $2.7B $203.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHRW or FWRD?
Forward Air has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of -8.26%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -158.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide8.02% $1.11 $3.1B FWRDForward Air12.28% -$1.68 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CHRW or FWRD?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $108.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.24%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 96.08%. Given that Forward Air has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Forward Air is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide11 11 1 FWRDForward Air2 4 0 -
Is CHRW or FWRD More Risky?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.866%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or FWRD?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or FWRD?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $613.3M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.28x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.18x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide0.62x 21.28x $4B $135.3M FWRDForward Air0.18x 9.40x $613.3M -$50.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHRW or HUBG?
Hub Group has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.97%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide8.02% $1.11 $3.1B HUBGHub Group24.55% $0.44 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CHRW or HUBG?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $108.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.24%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $38.65 which suggests that it could grow by 16.32%. Given that C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more attractive than Hub Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide11 11 1 HUBGHub Group4 12 0 -
Is CHRW or HUBG More Risky?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.131, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.054%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or HUBG?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or HUBG?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $915.2M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Hub Group's net income of $27.2M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.28x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.52x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide0.62x 21.28x $4B $135.3M HUBGHub Group0.52x 19.55x $915.2M $27.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHRW or PBI?
Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 7.18%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Pitney Bowes's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide8.02% $1.11 $3.1B PBIPitney Bowes54.54% $0.19 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CHRW or PBI?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $108.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.24%. On the other hand Pitney Bowes has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 83.19%. Given that Pitney Bowes has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Pitney Bowes is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide11 11 1 PBIPitney Bowes0 1 0 -
Is CHRW or PBI More Risky?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.41%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or PBI?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Pitney Bowes offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out -17.66% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or PBI?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Pitney Bowes quarterly revenues of $493.4M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Pitney Bowes's net income of $35.4M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.28x while Pitney Bowes's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.74x for Pitney Bowes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide0.62x 21.28x $4B $135.3M PBIPitney Bowes0.74x -- $493.4M $35.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CHRW or RLGT?
Radiant Logistics has a net margin of 3.34% compared to C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net margin of 2.45%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide8.02% $1.11 $3.1B RLGTRadiant Logistics14.63% $0.13 $214.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CHRW or RLGT?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a consensus price target of $108.76, signalling upside risk potential of 22.24%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.33%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide11 11 1 RLGTRadiant Logistics4 0 0 -
Is CHRW or RLGT More Risky?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.920, which suggesting that the stock is 8.012% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHRW or RLGT?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHRW or RLGT?
C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $264.5M. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M is higher than Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, C.H. Robinson Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.28x while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for C.H. Robinson Worldwide is 0.62x versus 0.34x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHRWC.H. Robinson Worldwide0.62x 21.28x $4B $135.3M RLGTRadiant Logistics0.34x 21.43x $264.5M $6.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
From time to time, investors will run across the term…
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
