KEYS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognex has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of 10.93%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Cognex's return on equity of 7.82%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $181.47, signalling upside risk potential of 13.4%. On the other hand Cognex has an analysts' consensus of $37.12 which suggests that it could grow by 24.89%. Given that Cognex has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Cognex is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognex has a beta of 1.455, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.497%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognex offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Cognex quarterly revenues of $216M. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Cognex's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.57x while Cognex's PE ratio is 43.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.46x versus 5.56x for Cognex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of 1.09%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -0.35%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $181.47, signalling upside risk potential of 13.4%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.76%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.713%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $82.9M. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of $906K. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.57x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.46x versus 2.38x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of 10.78%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $181.47, signalling upside risk potential of 13.4%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $128.58 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.716%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.57x while Itron's PE ratio is 20.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.46x versus 2.13x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teledyne Technologies has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Keysight Technologies's net margin of 13.01%. Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 14.32% beat Teledyne Technologies's return on equity of 8.69%.

Keysight Technologies has a consensus price target of $181.47, signalling upside risk potential of 13.4%. On the other hand Teledyne Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $557.14 which suggests that it could grow by 14.59%. Given that Teledyne Technologies has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Teledyne Technologies is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.104, which suggesting that the stock is 10.426% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teledyne Technologies has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.379%.

Keysight Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teledyne Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Keysight Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teledyne Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Teledyne Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Keysight Technologies's net income of $257M is higher than Teledyne Technologies's net income of $188.6M. Notably, Keysight Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.57x while Teledyne Technologies's PE ratio is 27.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Keysight Technologies is 5.46x versus 4.00x for Teledyne Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.