FARO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of -5.67%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.43%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.03%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $163.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.6%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Keysight Technologies, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Keysight Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.23%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is higher than Keysight Technologies's net income of -$73M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 47.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.42x versus 5.79x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of --. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.03%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 497.02%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.446%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.42x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of 11.08%. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.03%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 35.82%. Given that LGL Group has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe LGL Group is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.546, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.4%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is lower than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LGL Group's PE ratio is 109.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.42x versus 16.02x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luna Innovations has a net margin of -0.35% compared to Faro Technologies's net margin of --. Faro Technologies's return on equity of -2.49% beat Luna Innovations's return on equity of --.

Faro Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 14.03%. On the other hand Luna Innovations has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 314.63%. Given that Luna Innovations has higher upside potential than Faro Technologies, analysts believe Luna Innovations is more attractive than Faro Technologies.

Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luna Innovations has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.716%.

Faro Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luna Innovations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Faro Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luna Innovations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Faro Technologies quarterly revenues are $82.6M, which are larger than Luna Innovations quarterly revenues of --. Faro Technologies's net income of -$289K is higher than Luna Innovations's net income of --. Notably, Faro Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luna Innovations's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Faro Technologies is 1.42x versus 0.59x for Luna Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.