GAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Gap's net margin of 11.81%. Gap's return on equity of 28.9% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 47.39%.

Gap has a consensus price target of $25.31, signalling downside risk potential of -7.61%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $121.47 which suggests that it could grow by 53.52%. Given that Abercrombie & Fitch has higher upside potential than Gap, analysts believe Abercrombie & Fitch is more attractive than Gap.

Gap has a beta of 2.250, which suggesting that the stock is 124.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.814%.

Gap has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gap pays 26.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gap quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Gap's net income of $206M is higher than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $187.2M. Notably, Gap's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gap is 0.70x versus 0.85x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macy's has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Gap's net margin of 4.27%. Gap's return on equity of 28.9% beat Macy's's return on equity of 13.71%.

Gap has a consensus price target of $25.31, signalling downside risk potential of -7.61%. On the other hand Macy's has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.02%. Given that Macy's has higher upside potential than Gap, analysts believe Macy's is more attractive than Gap.

Gap has a beta of 2.250, which suggesting that the stock is 124.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macy's has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.877%.

Gap has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Macy's offers a yield of 5.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Gap pays 26.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Macy's pays out 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gap quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Macy's quarterly revenues of $8B. Gap's net income of $206M is lower than Macy's's net income of $342M. Notably, Gap's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Macy's's PE ratio is 5.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gap is 0.70x versus 0.15x for Macy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Gap's net margin of 7.35%. Gap's return on equity of 28.9% beat Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 17.74%.

Gap has a consensus price target of $25.31, signalling downside risk potential of -7.61%. On the other hand Urban Outfitters has an analysts' consensus of $56.50 which suggests that it could fall by -10.05%. Given that Urban Outfitters has more downside risk than Gap, analysts believe Gap is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Gap has a beta of 2.250, which suggesting that the stock is 124.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.282%.

Gap has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Urban Outfitters offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gap pays 26.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Outfitters pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gap quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Gap's net income of $206M is higher than Urban Outfitters's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Gap's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Urban Outfitters's PE ratio is 14.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gap is 0.70x versus 1.07x for Urban Outfitters. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Gap's net margin of 9.16%. Gap's return on equity of 28.9% beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08%.

Gap has a consensus price target of $25.31, signalling downside risk potential of -7.61%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $22.41 which suggests that it could fall by -4.93%. Given that Gap has more downside risk than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe Victoria's Secret & is more attractive than Gap.

Gap has a beta of 2.250, which suggesting that the stock is 124.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gap has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gap pays 26.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gap's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gap quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Gap's net income of $206M is higher than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of $193M. Notably, Gap's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 11.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gap is 0.70x versus 0.31x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.