DCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astronics has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of -1.36%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat Astronics's return on equity of -6.41%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $79.20, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand Astronics has an analysts' consensus of $22.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Astronics.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astronics has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Astronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are smaller than Astronics quarterly revenues of $208.5M. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is higher than Astronics's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while Astronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.05x versus 0.89x for Astronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 3.86%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $79.20, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.48%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.4%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 13.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.05x versus 0.52x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of -13.31%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -6.68%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $79.20, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Servotronics.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.469%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $9.8M. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is higher than Servotronics's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.05x versus 0.60x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodward has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Ducommun's net margin of 11.27%. Ducommun's return on equity of 4.79% beat Woodward's return on equity of 16.72%.

Ducommun has a consensus price target of $79.20, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand Woodward has an analysts' consensus of $194.23 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Ducommun has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodward has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.328%.

Ducommun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodward offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Ducommun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward pays out 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ducommun quarterly revenues are $197.3M, which are smaller than Woodward quarterly revenues of $772.7M. Ducommun's net income of $6.8M is lower than Woodward's net income of $87.1M. Notably, Ducommun's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.16x while Woodward's PE ratio is 28.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ducommun is 1.05x versus 3.14x for Woodward. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.