CRGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 24.92%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 36.38%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.96x versus 3.05x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 57.9%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 35.16%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.96x versus 1.69x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 37.44%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $56.36 which suggests that it could grow by 41.72%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.189%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. SM Energy offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 5.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.96x versus 1.78x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W&T Offshore has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -30.42%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 1.6% beat W&T Offshore's return on equity of -579.3%.

Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $17.70, signalling upside risk potential of 27.61%. On the other hand W&T Offshore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 553.6%. Given that W&T Offshore has higher upside potential than Crescent Energy, analysts believe W&T Offshore is more attractive than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W&T Offshore has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.897%.

Crescent Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. W&T Offshore offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Crescent Energy pays 50.47% of its earnings as a dividend. W&T Offshore pays out 9.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Energy quarterly revenues are $744.9M, which are larger than W&T Offshore quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Crescent Energy's net income of -$9.9M is higher than W&T Offshore's net income of -$36.9M. Notably, Crescent Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.91x while W&T Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Energy is 0.96x versus 0.42x for W&T Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.