BLDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AGCO has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 0.51%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat AGCO's return on equity of -13.26%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $142.04, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand AGCO has an analysts' consensus of $105.89 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than AGCO.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AGCO has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.446%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AGCO offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGCO pays out -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than AGCO quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is higher than AGCO's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while AGCO's PE ratio is 43.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.78x versus 0.70x for AGCO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AMETEK has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 20.31%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat AMETEK's return on equity of 14.95%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $142.04, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand AMETEK has an analysts' consensus of $192.44 which suggests that it could grow by 8.33%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than AMETEK, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than AMETEK.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMETEK has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.982%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMETEK offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMETEK pays out 18.81% of its earnings as a dividend. AMETEK's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than AMETEK quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is lower than AMETEK's net income of $351.8M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while AMETEK's PE ratio is 29.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.78x versus 5.94x for AMETEK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 6.26%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $142.04, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.78%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.439%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $799M. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is higher than Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 47.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.78x versus 3.29x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 5.45%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $142.04, signalling upside risk potential of 31.12%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $244.09 which suggests that it could grow by 8.61%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.792, which suggesting that the stock is 79.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.67%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is lower than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.89x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 16.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.78x versus 0.77x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.