DRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astronics has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of -1.36%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Astronics's return on equity of -6.41%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Astronics has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Astronics.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.387% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astronics has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.581%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Astronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Astronics quarterly revenues of $208.5M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Astronics's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.16x while Astronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.50x versus 0.99x for Astronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 3.86%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.387% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.4%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.16x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 12.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.50x versus 0.50x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Solutions and Support has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of 4.61%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Innovative Solutions and Support's return on equity of 15.25%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Innovative Solutions and Support has an analysts' consensus of $10.90 which suggests that it could grow by 91.23%. Given that Innovative Solutions and Support has higher upside potential than Leonardo DRS, analysts believe Innovative Solutions and Support is more attractive than Leonardo DRS.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.387% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Solutions and Support has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.052%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Innovative Solutions and Support offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Solutions and Support pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Innovative Solutions and Support quarterly revenues of $16M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Innovative Solutions and Support's net income of $736.2K. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.16x while Innovative Solutions and Support's PE ratio is 15.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.50x versus 1.85x for Innovative Solutions and Support. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Servotronics has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Leonardo DRS's net margin of -13.31%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 8.79% beat Servotronics's return on equity of -6.68%.

Leonardo DRS has a consensus price target of $37.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.38%. On the other hand Servotronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Servotronics, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Servotronics.

Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.387% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Servotronics has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.469%.

Leonardo DRS has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Servotronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leonardo DRS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Servotronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues are $981M, which are larger than Servotronics quarterly revenues of $9.8M. Leonardo DRS's net income of $89M is higher than Servotronics's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Leonardo DRS's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.16x while Servotronics's PE ratio is 211.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leonardo DRS is 2.50x versus 0.59x for Servotronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.