BE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plug Power has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -147.12%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -79.04%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.73, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $1.87 which suggests that it could grow by 136.25%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.686%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $133.7M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$196.7M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.89x versus 1.06x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -104.71%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -51.77%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.73, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of $26.66 which suggests that it could fall by -24.93%. Given that Bloom Energy has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Bloom Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $13.4M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than NuScale Power's net income of -$14M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.89x versus 76.24x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TPI Composites has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -14.37%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.73, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand TPI Composites has an analysts' consensus of $1.82 which suggests that it could grow by 33.93%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TPI Composites has a beta of 2.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.107%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TPI Composites offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. TPI Composites pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are smaller than TPI Composites quarterly revenues of $336.2M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is higher than TPI Composites's net income of -$48.3M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TPI Composites's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.89x versus 0.05x for TPI Composites. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of -7.3% compared to Bloom Energy's net margin of -1.81%. Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.7%.

Bloom Energy has a consensus price target of $23.73, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.38%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, which suggesting that the stock is 225.12% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.099%.

Bloom Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bloom Energy pays -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloom Energy quarterly revenues are $326M, which are larger than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $81.2M. Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M is lower than Twin Disc's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Bloom Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 25.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloom Energy is 2.89x versus 0.31x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.