TPIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloom Energy has a net margin of -13.88% compared to TPI Composites's net margin of -7.3%. TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14% beat Bloom Energy's return on equity of 0.87%.

TPI Composites has a consensus price target of $3.14, signalling upside risk potential of 229.15%. On the other hand Bloom Energy has an analysts' consensus of $23.45 which suggests that it could grow by 41.84%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Bloom Energy, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Bloom Energy.

TPI Composites has a beta of 2.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloom Energy has a beta of 3.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 225.12%.

TPI Composites has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bloom Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TPI Composites pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bloom Energy pays out -5.02% of its earnings as a dividend.

TPI Composites quarterly revenues are $346.5M, which are larger than Bloom Energy quarterly revenues of $326M. TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M is lower than Bloom Energy's net income of -$23.8M. Notably, TPI Composites's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bloom Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPI Composites is 0.03x versus 2.41x for Bloom Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of -13.88% compared to TPI Composites's net margin of 15.38%. TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

TPI Composites has a consensus price target of $3.14, signalling upside risk potential of 229.15%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $243.29 which suggests that it could grow by 29.11%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Nordson.

TPI Composites has a beta of 2.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.784%.

TPI Composites has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. TPI Composites pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TPI Composites quarterly revenues are $346.5M, which are smaller than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M is lower than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, TPI Composites's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nordson's PE ratio is 23.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPI Composites is 0.03x versus 4.06x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Serve Robotics has a net margin of -13.88% compared to TPI Composites's net margin of -7460.96%. TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14% beat Serve Robotics's return on equity of -96.3%.

TPI Composites has a consensus price target of $3.14, signalling upside risk potential of 229.15%. On the other hand Serve Robotics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 164%. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Serve Robotics, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Serve Robotics.

TPI Composites has a beta of 2.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Serve Robotics has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TPI Composites has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Serve Robotics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TPI Composites pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Serve Robotics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TPI Composites quarterly revenues are $346.5M, which are larger than Serve Robotics quarterly revenues of $175.8K. TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M is lower than Serve Robotics's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, TPI Composites's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Serve Robotics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPI Composites is 0.03x versus 128.02x for Serve Robotics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taylor Devices has a net margin of -13.88% compared to TPI Composites's net margin of 18.95%. TPI Composites's return on equity of -248.14% beat Taylor Devices's return on equity of 15.37%.

TPI Composites has a consensus price target of $3.14, signalling upside risk potential of 229.15%. On the other hand Taylor Devices has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TPI Composites has higher upside potential than Taylor Devices, analysts believe TPI Composites is more attractive than Taylor Devices.

TPI Composites has a beta of 2.051, which suggesting that the stock is 105.107% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taylor Devices has a beta of 0.791, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.863%.

TPI Composites has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Taylor Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TPI Composites pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taylor Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TPI Composites quarterly revenues are $346.5M, which are larger than Taylor Devices quarterly revenues of $10.6M. TPI Composites's net income of -$48.1M is lower than Taylor Devices's net income of $2M. Notably, TPI Composites's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Taylor Devices's PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TPI Composites is 0.03x versus 2.61x for Taylor Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.