BANC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fulton Financial has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 19.47%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand Fulton Financial has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 14.4%. Given that Banc of California has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe Banc of California is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.759% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.555%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Fulton Financial offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Fulton Financial pays out 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Fulton Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are smaller than Fulton Financial quarterly revenues of $324.6M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fulton Financial's PE ratio is 12.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 5.09x versus 3.06x for Fulton Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heartland Financial USA has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 31.56%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat Heartland Financial USA's return on equity of 4.3%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand Heartland Financial USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Banc of California has higher upside potential than Heartland Financial USA, analysts believe Banc of California is more attractive than Heartland Financial USA.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.759% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Financial USA has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.876%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Heartland Financial USA offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA pays out 74.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are larger than Heartland Financial USA quarterly revenues of $203.3M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than Heartland Financial USA's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Heartland Financial USA's PE ratio is 35.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 5.09x versus 4.49x for Heartland Financial USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 30.13%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $138.89 which suggests that it could grow by 19.77%. Given that Banc of California has higher upside potential than UMB Financial, analysts believe Banc of California is more attractive than UMB Financial.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.759% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.731%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are smaller than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $363.9M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 14.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 5.09x versus 4.03x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorp NA has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 27.02%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 19.9%. On the other hand Zions Bancorp NA has an analysts' consensus of $60.10 which suggests that it could grow by 8.58%. Given that Banc of California has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe Banc of California is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.759% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.227%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.55%. Zions Bancorp NA offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA pays out 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are smaller than Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues of $792M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zions Bancorp NA's PE ratio is 12.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 5.09x versus 2.69x for Zions Bancorp NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.