FULT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 31.58%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.7%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 3.06x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 2.88x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.97%. Given that Fulton Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Fulton Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 5.69x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 19.47% compared to Fulton Financial's net margin of 27.37%. Fulton Financial's return on equity of 9.88% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.1%.

Fulton Financial has a consensus price target of $22.83, signalling upside risk potential of 16.2%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $27.90 which suggests that it could grow by 17.51%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Fulton Financial, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Fulton Financial.

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.774, which suggesting that the stock is 22.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.148%.

Fulton Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fulton Financial pays 40.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 42.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fulton Financial quarterly revenues are $324.6M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fulton Financial's net income of $63.2M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, Fulton Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.44x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 13.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fulton Financial is 3.01x versus 3.10x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.