ALB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Mosaic has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 6%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 1.46%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $90.59, signalling upside risk potential of 65.4%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.94 which suggests that it could grow by 18.23%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than The Mosaic, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than The Mosaic.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.186%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 154.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $169M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 50.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.20x versus 0.80x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 5.56%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $90.59, signalling upside risk potential of 65.4%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $49.75 which suggests that it could grow by 57.09%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Ingevity, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Ingevity.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.443%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $298.8M. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is higher than Ingevity's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.20x versus 0.82x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of --. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $90.59, signalling upside risk potential of 65.4%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 262.41%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.20x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 5.35%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $90.59, signalling upside risk potential of 65.4%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $144.86 which suggests that it could grow by 23.4%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 11.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.20x versus 1.04x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.