ABG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bath & Body Works has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 16.25%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Bath & Body Works's return on equity of --.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $241.14, signalling upside risk potential of 2.58%. On the other hand Bath & Body Works has an analysts' consensus of $43.98 which suggests that it could grow by 30.28%. Given that Bath & Body Works has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Bath & Body Works is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bath & Body Works has a beta of 1.870, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.951%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bath & Body Works offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works pays out 22.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Bath & Body Works quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Bath & Body Works's net income of $453M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Bath & Body Works's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 1.02x for Bath & Body Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.28%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.88%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $241.14, signalling upside risk potential of 2.58%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $384.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.91%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.303%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 7.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.24x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 3.21%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 18.44%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $241.14, signalling upside risk potential of 2.58%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of $168.26 which suggests that it could grow by 1.03%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Penske Automotive Group, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Penske Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.817%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $244.3M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.36x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 1.93%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 24.38%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $241.14, signalling upside risk potential of 2.58%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.45%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Sonic Automotive, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Sonic Automotive.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.12%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 18.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $70.6M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 9.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.27x versus 0.17x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.