ABG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 8.3%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -1.6%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $248.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.81%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 87.5%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.336%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $775.5M. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of $64.3M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.25x versus 0.20x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.28%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.88%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $248.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.81%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $389.24 which suggests that it could grow by 32.5%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.303%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 7.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.5M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 9.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.25x versus 0.21x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 3.21%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 18.44%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $248.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.81%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of $170.03 which suggests that it could grow by 9.27%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Penske Automotive Group, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Penske Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.817%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 29.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $244.3M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 10.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.25x versus 0.34x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 1.93%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 12.1% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 24.38%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of $248.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.81%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $70.40 which suggests that it could grow by 13.95%. Given that Sonic Automotive has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Sonic Automotive is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.086% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.12%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 18.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $132.1M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $70.6M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.39x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 8.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.25x versus 0.15x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.