ABG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 2.98% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.27%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 10.8% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.55%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.01%. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $397.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.095%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 5.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $126.3M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.1M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.30x versus 0.29x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 2.98% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.98%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 10.8% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 17.91%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.01%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Penske Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Penske Automotive Group is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.766%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 17.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $126.3M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $226.1M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 12.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.30x versus 0.35x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Enterprises has a net margin of 2.98% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 4.17%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 10.8% beat Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.54%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.01%. On the other hand Rush Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.13%. Given that Rush Enterprises has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, analysts believe Rush Enterprises is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Enterprises has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.052000000000008%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Enterprises offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises pays out 14.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $126.3M is higher than Rush Enterprises's net income of $79.1M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Rush Enterprises's PE ratio is 14.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.30x versus 0.57x for Rush Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive has a net margin of 2.98% compared to Asbury Automotive Group's net margin of 2.13%. Asbury Automotive Group's return on equity of 10.8% beat Sonic Automotive's return on equity of 21.25%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.01%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $61.43 which suggests that it could grow by 5.29%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Sonic Automotive, analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group is more attractive than Sonic Automotive.

Asbury Automotive Group has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive has a beta of 1.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.957%.

Asbury Automotive Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Asbury Automotive Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Asbury Automotive Group's net income of $126.3M is higher than Sonic Automotive's net income of $74.2M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.98x while Sonic Automotive's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group is 0.30x versus 0.16x for Sonic Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.