SLND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of -1.9% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 15.25%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.3%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.12%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.28 which suggests that it could fall by -9.47%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Fastenal.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.211%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Southland Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.5M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $2B. Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.7M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fastenal's PE ratio is 41.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.20x versus 6.28x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a net margin of -1.9% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 13.76%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72% beat Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's return on equity of 15.97%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.12%. On the other hand Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.49%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Lakes Dredge & Dock has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.18%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Southland Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.5M, which are smaller than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock quarterly revenues of $242.9M. Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's PE ratio is 10.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.20x versus 0.93x for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Construction has a net margin of -1.9% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of -4.81%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 11.94%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.12%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.335, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.482%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Southland Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.5M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $699.5M. Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is higher than Granite Construction's net income of -$33.7M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 36.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.20x versus 1.08x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of -1.9% compared to Southland Holdings's net margin of 0.74%. Southland Holdings's return on equity of -55.72% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38%.

Southland Holdings has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.12%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $108.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.11%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.138%.

Southland Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Southland Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Southland Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.5M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $571.7M. Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.6M is lower than Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Southland Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 87.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Southland Holdings is 0.20x versus 2.51x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.