Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
45
WLGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.92
Seasonality move
:
25%
Day range:
$1.88 - $2.50
52-week range:
$0.44 - $5.57
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
4.90x
Volume:
143.6K
Avg. volume:
140.5K
1-year change:
134.95%
Market cap:
$29.4M
Revenue:
$6.8M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.95 | -- | $29.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.56 | -- | $5.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.53 | -- | $11.8M | 5.46x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.69x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.91 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.05 | 6.28% | 1.11x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.87 | -- | $15.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.75x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
$0.81 | -- | $12.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.67x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -2.370 | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 1.447 | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | 0.101 | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.211 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -2.356 | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 10.90x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -31.63% | -31.63% | -- | -- |
WANG & LEE Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of -- beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or CHNR?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or CHNR More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or CHNR?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or CHNR?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is -- versus -- for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of -- beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or CLWT?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or CLWT More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.226%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or CLWT?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or CLWT?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 5.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is -- versus 0.69x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.69x 5.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or HIHO?
Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of 10.91%. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of -- beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or HIHO?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Highway Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or HIHO More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.549%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or HIHO?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or HIHO?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is -- versus 1.11x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings1.11x -- $2.1M $231K
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of -- beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or ILAG?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or ILAG More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or ILAG?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or ILAG?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is -- versus 1.75x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group1.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLGS or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance has a net margin of -- compared to WANG & LEE Group's net margin of --. WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of -- beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -31.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.4M -
What do Analysts Say About WLGS or ROMA?
WANG & LEE Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WANG & LEE Group has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe WANG & LEE Group is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 -
Is WLGS or ROMA More Risky?
WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLGS or ROMA?
WANG & LEE Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WANG & LEE Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLGS or ROMA?
WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. WANG & LEE Group's net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, WANG & LEE Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WANG & LEE Group is -- versus 6.67x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance6.67x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
