Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
48
CLWT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.40
Seasonality move
:
12.75%
Day range:
$1.48 - $1.53
52-week range:
$1.28 - $1.94
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.46x
P/S ratio:
0.69x
P/B ratio:
0.78x
Volume:
2.8K
Avg. volume:
7.6K
1-year change:
-10%
Market cap:
$11.8M
Revenue:
$17.9M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.53 | -- | $11.8M | 5.46x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.69x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.56 | -- | $5.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.91 | -- | $8.4M | -- | $0.05 | 6.28% | 1.11x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.87 | -- | $15.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.75x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
$0.81 | -- | $12.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.67x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.95 | -- | $29.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | 0.101 | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 1.447 | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.211 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -2.356 | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 10.90x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -2.370 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -31.63% | -31.63% | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Euro Tech Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or CHNR?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or CHNR More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or CHNR?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or CHNR?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.46x while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.69x versus -- for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.69x 5.46x -- -- CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or HIHO?
Highway Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of 10.91%. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than Highway Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or HIHO More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.549%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings offers a yield of 6.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings pays out -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or HIHO?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings's net income of $231K. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.46x while Highway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.69x versus 1.11x for Highway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.69x 5.46x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings1.11x -- $2.1M $231K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or ILAG More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or ILAG?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.46x while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.69x versus 1.75x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.69x 5.46x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group1.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -31.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or ROMA More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or ROMA?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.46x while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.69x versus 6.67x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.69x 5.46x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance6.67x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLWT or WLGS?
WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of -- compared to Euro Tech Holdings's net margin of --. Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of -- beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- -- WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLWT or WLGS?
Euro Tech Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Euro Tech Holdings has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Euro Tech Holdings is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 -
Is CLWT or WLGS More Risky?
Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.598, which suggesting that the stock is 40.226% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLWT or WLGS?
Euro Tech Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Euro Tech Holdings pays 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLWT or WLGS?
Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Euro Tech Holdings's net income of -- is lower than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Euro Tech Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.46x while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Euro Tech Holdings is 0.69x versus -- for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.69x 5.46x -- -- WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
40
MSTR alert for Dec 24
MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 8.05% over the past day.
Sell
26
NUTX alert for Dec 24
Nutex Health [NUTX] is down 0.76% over the past day.
Sell
48
VRNA alert for Dec 24
Verona Pharma PLC [VRNA] is down 0.4% over the past day.
