UPXI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Groupon has a net margin of -32.49% compared to Upexi's net margin of -38.85%. Upexi's return on equity of -181.37% beat Groupon's return on equity of -240.37%.

Upexi has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1057.41%. On the other hand Groupon has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could fall by -2.26%. Given that Upexi has higher upside potential than Groupon, analysts believe Upexi is more attractive than Groupon.

Upexi has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Groupon has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.458%.

Upexi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Groupon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upexi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Groupon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upexi quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Groupon quarterly revenues of $130.4M. Upexi's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Groupon's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, Upexi's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Groupon's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upexi is 0.57x versus 1.49x for Groupon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -32.49% compared to Upexi's net margin of 43.07%. Upexi's return on equity of -181.37% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66%.

Upexi has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1057.41%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $763.99 which suggests that it could grow by 43.71%. Given that Upexi has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Upexi is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Upexi has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.917%.

Upexi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Upexi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upexi quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $48.4B. Upexi's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B. Notably, Upexi's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upexi is 0.57x versus 8.44x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of -32.49% compared to Upexi's net margin of 3.31%. Upexi's return on equity of -181.37% beat comScore's return on equity of -211.7%.

Upexi has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1057.41%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of $7.13 which suggests that it could grow by 22.85%. Given that Upexi has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe Upexi is more attractive than comScore.

Upexi has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.035%.

Upexi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upexi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upexi quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than comScore quarterly revenues of $94.9M. Upexi's net income of -$1.3M is lower than comScore's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Upexi's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upexi is 0.57x versus 0.08x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of -32.49% compared to Upexi's net margin of -24.06%. Upexi's return on equity of -181.37% beat Zedge's return on equity of -6.45%.

Upexi has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1057.41%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.86%. Given that Upexi has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe Upexi is more attractive than Zedge.

Upexi has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.607%.

Upexi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upexi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upexi quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7M. Upexi's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Zedge's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Upexi's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upexi is 0.57x versus 1.12x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.