SCOR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Groupon has a net margin of -68.53% compared to comScore's net margin of 12.17%. comScore's return on equity of -108.24% beat Groupon's return on equity of 297.62%.

comScore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Groupon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.53%. Given that comScore has higher upside potential than Groupon, analysts believe comScore is more attractive than Groupon.

comScore has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Groupon has a beta of 1.721, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.084%.

comScore has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Groupon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. comScore pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Groupon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

comScore quarterly revenues are $88.5M, which are smaller than Groupon quarterly revenues of $114.5M. comScore's net income of -$60.6M is lower than Groupon's net income of $13.9M. Notably, comScore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Groupon's PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for comScore is 0.08x versus 0.92x for Groupon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -68.53% compared to comScore's net margin of 38.65%. comScore's return on equity of -108.24% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21%.

comScore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $654.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.04%. Given that comScore has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe comScore is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

comScore has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.786%.

comScore has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. comScore pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

comScore quarterly revenues are $88.5M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $40.6B. comScore's net income of -$60.6M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B. Notably, comScore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 28.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for comScore is 0.08x versus 10.06x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thryv Holdings has a net margin of -68.53% compared to comScore's net margin of -53.42%. comScore's return on equity of -108.24% beat Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -170.77%.

comScore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Thryv Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.52%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than comScore.

comScore has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thryv Holdings has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.012999999999996%.

comScore has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Thryv Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. comScore pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thryv Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

comScore quarterly revenues are $88.5M, which are smaller than Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues of $179.9M. comScore's net income of -$60.6M is higher than Thryv Holdings's net income of -$96.1M. Notably, comScore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Thryv Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for comScore is 0.08x versus 0.62x for Thryv Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of -68.53% compared to comScore's net margin of -4.71%. comScore's return on equity of -108.24% beat Zedge's return on equity of -29.39%.

comScore has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.98%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.62%. Given that comScore has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe comScore is more attractive than Zedge.

comScore has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.92%.

comScore has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. comScore pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

comScore quarterly revenues are $88.5M, which are larger than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7.2M. comScore's net income of -$60.6M is lower than Zedge's net income of -$339K. Notably, comScore's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for comScore is 0.08x versus 1.46x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.