TRMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ESCO Technologies has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Trimble's net margin of 9.5%. Trimble's return on equity of 28.82% beat ESCO Technologies's return on equity of 9.2%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $87.95, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand ESCO Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $170.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.23%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than ESCO Technologies, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than ESCO Technologies.

Trimble has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.127%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ESCO Technologies offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies pays out 8.09% of its earnings as a dividend. ESCO Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $983.4M, which are larger than ESCO Technologies quarterly revenues of $247M. Trimble's net income of $90.2M is higher than ESCO Technologies's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while ESCO Technologies's PE ratio is 35.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.13x versus 3.72x for ESCO Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faro Technologies has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Trimble's net margin of -1.05%. Trimble's return on equity of 28.82% beat Faro Technologies's return on equity of -3.51%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $87.95, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand Faro Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 49.05%. Given that Faro Technologies has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Faro Technologies is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faro Technologies has a beta of 1.555, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.481%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faro Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faro Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $983.4M, which are larger than Faro Technologies quarterly revenues of $93.5M. Trimble's net income of $90.2M is higher than Faro Technologies's net income of -$986K. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while Faro Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.13x versus 1.44x for Faro Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Know Labs has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Trimble's net margin of --. Trimble's return on equity of 28.82% beat Know Labs's return on equity of --.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $87.95, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand Know Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1167.43%. Given that Know Labs has higher upside potential than Trimble, analysts believe Know Labs is more attractive than Trimble.

Trimble has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Know Labs has a beta of 1.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.018%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Know Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Know Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $983.4M, which are larger than Know Labs quarterly revenues of --. Trimble's net income of $90.2M is higher than Know Labs's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while Know Labs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.13x versus -- for Know Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LGL Group has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Trimble's net margin of 11.08%. Trimble's return on equity of 28.82% beat LGL Group's return on equity of 0.89%.

Trimble has a consensus price target of $87.95, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand LGL Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.21%. Given that Trimble has higher upside potential than LGL Group, analysts believe Trimble is more attractive than LGL Group.

Trimble has a beta of 1.573, which suggesting that the stock is 57.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGL Group has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.692%.

Trimble has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGL Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trimble pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGL Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trimble quarterly revenues are $983.4M, which are larger than LGL Group quarterly revenues of $650K. Trimble's net income of $90.2M is higher than LGL Group's net income of $72K. Notably, Trimble's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while LGL Group's PE ratio is 89.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trimble is 4.13x versus 16.46x for LGL Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.