RCAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Key Tronic has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -4.32%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Key Tronic's return on equity of -6.34%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 159.91%. On the other hand Key Tronic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 287.03%. Given that Key Tronic has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe Key Tronic is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Key Tronic has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.647%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Key Tronic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Key Tronic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Key Tronic quarterly revenues of $113.9M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than Key Tronic's net income of -$4.9M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Key Tronic's PE ratio is 214.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 21.85x versus 0.05x for Key Tronic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -15.14%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -50.46%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 159.91%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.31 which suggests that it could grow by 77.52%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.121%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $402.2M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$60.9M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 21.85x versus 2.51x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -27.9%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 159.91%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.19%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.121%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $150.4M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 21.85x versus 1.12x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -105.32%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 159.91%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1720.39%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.627% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 392.029%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 21.85x versus 0.11x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.