PUBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -1.27% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -11.03%. PubMatic's return on equity of 6.1% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.29%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 98.28%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.959%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $71.8M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. PubMatic's net income of -$912K is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.58x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.94x versus 0.69x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of -1.27% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 10.74%. PubMatic's return on equity of 6.1% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.29%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $71.8M, which are smaller than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $169.6M. PubMatic's net income of -$912K is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.58x while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 53.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.94x versus 5.43x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of -1.27% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 14.99%. PubMatic's return on equity of 6.1% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 13.38%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.29%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $130.20 which suggests that it could grow by 5.03%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than The Trade Desk, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than The Trade Desk.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.721%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $71.8M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $628M. PubMatic's net income of -$912K is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $94.2M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.58x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 203.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.94x versus 26.84x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -1.27% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -6.48%. PubMatic's return on equity of 6.1% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $20.33, signalling upside risk potential of 32.29%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 101.54%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $71.8M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $268.3M. PubMatic's net income of -$912K is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.58x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.94x versus 3.64x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.