PUBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 43.65%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 95.64%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $482.37 which suggests that it could grow by 84.12%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than AppLovin, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than AppLovin.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.4B. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $599.2M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while AppLovin's PE ratio is 57.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.60x versus 19.35x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -26.62%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 95.64%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than Castellum.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 488.969%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.60x versus 1.26x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 8.91%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of --.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 95.64%. On the other hand DigitalOcean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $45.08 which suggests that it could grow by 44.34%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DigitalOcean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalOcean Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are smaller than DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues of $204.9M. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is lower than DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while DigitalOcean Holdings's PE ratio is 35.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.60x versus 3.83x for DigitalOcean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 24.59%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 15.96%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 95.64%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $106.39 which suggests that it could grow by 116.76%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.206%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $741M. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $182.2M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.39x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 62.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.60x versus 10.08x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.