DOCN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dynatrace has a net margin of 8.91% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of 82.94%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Dynatrace's return on equity of 22.55%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.46, signalling upside risk potential of 57.24%. On the other hand Dynatrace has an analysts' consensus of $64.85 which suggests that it could grow by 50.42%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than Dynatrace, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than Dynatrace.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynatrace has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.275%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dynatrace offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dynatrace pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $204.9M, which are smaller than Dynatrace quarterly revenues of $436.2M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M is lower than Dynatrace's net income of $361.8M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.77x while Dynatrace's PE ratio is 26.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 3.39x versus 7.97x for Dynatrace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MongoDB has a net margin of 8.91% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of 2.89%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MongoDB's return on equity of -8.08%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.46, signalling upside risk potential of 57.24%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $293.31 which suggests that it could grow by 80.79%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.764%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $204.9M, which are smaller than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $548.4M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M is higher than MongoDB's net income of $15.8M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.77x while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 3.39x versus 6.09x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 8.91% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of 24.59%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 15.96%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.46, signalling upside risk potential of 57.24%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $98.10 which suggests that it could grow by 97.06%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.206%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $204.9M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $741M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $182.2M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.77x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 63.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 3.39x versus 10.22x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 8.91% compared to DigitalOcean Holdings's net margin of -1.19%. DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Zscaler's return on equity of -1.22%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.46, signalling upside risk potential of 57.24%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $237.44 which suggests that it could grow by 19.87%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than Zscaler.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.827%.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DigitalOcean Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues are $204.9M, which are smaller than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $647.9M. DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, DigitalOcean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.77x while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DigitalOcean Holdings is 3.39x versus 12.51x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.