PRTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of 24.04%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.12%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $311.94 which suggests that it could fall by -3.02%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays 325.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Priority Technology Holdings's is not.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $8.3M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 32.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 0.66x versus 6.91x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of 18.49%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.12%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $323.48 which suggests that it could grow by 9.2%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings is more attractive than Autodesk.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays 325.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $8.3M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 57.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 0.66x versus 10.44x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AudioEye has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of -15.09%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat AudioEye's return on equity of -70.92%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.12%. On the other hand AudioEye has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could grow by 79.2%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AudioEye has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.891%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AudioEye offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays 325.64% of its earnings as a dividend. AudioEye pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than AudioEye quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AudioEye's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 0.66x versus 4.09x for AudioEye. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 3.68% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of -4.72%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of $12.80, signalling upside risk potential of 71.12%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 234.54%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays 325.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $224.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $8.3M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 0.66x versus 0.66x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.