AEYE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -15.09% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 24.04%. AudioEye's return on equity of -70.92% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.65%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

AudioEye has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.90x versus 6.60x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -15.09% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 0.54%. AudioEye's return on equity of -70.92% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 254.61%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than AudioEye, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than AudioEye.

AudioEye has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.90x versus 0.66x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Priority Technology Holdings has a net margin of -15.09% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 3.68%. AudioEye's return on equity of -70.92% beat Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand Priority Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.80 which suggests that it could grow by 90.76%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than AudioEye, analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings is more attractive than AudioEye.

AudioEye has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.505, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.477%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Priority Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Priority Technology Holdings pays out 325.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of $224.6M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Priority Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.90x versus 0.59x for Priority Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEMrush Holdings has a net margin of -15.09% compared to AudioEye's net margin of 0.81%. AudioEye's return on equity of -70.92% beat SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 2.71%.

AudioEye has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 87.92%. On the other hand SEMrush Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than SEMrush Holdings, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than SEMrush Holdings.

AudioEye has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.891% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AudioEye has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEMrush Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioEye pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEMrush Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AudioEye quarterly revenues are $9.7M, which are smaller than SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues of $105M. AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M is lower than SEMrush Holdings's net income of $849K. Notably, AudioEye's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEMrush Holdings's PE ratio is 200.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioEye is 3.90x versus 3.78x for SEMrush Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.