PETZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of -- compared to TDH Holdings's net margin of 0.11%. TDH Holdings's return on equity of -91.4% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.38%.

TDH Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TDH Holdings has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe TDH Holdings is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

TDH Holdings has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.217, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.294%.

TDH Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. TDH Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 27.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TDH Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $50.3M. TDH Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $55K. Notably, TDH Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 15.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TDH Holdings is 16.48x versus 0.26x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BJ's Restaurants has a net margin of -- compared to TDH Holdings's net margin of 3.88%. TDH Holdings's return on equity of -91.4% beat BJ's Restaurants's return on equity of 5.97%.

TDH Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BJ's Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $41.83 which suggests that it could grow by 0.63%. Given that BJ's Restaurants has higher upside potential than TDH Holdings, analysts believe BJ's Restaurants is more attractive than TDH Holdings.

TDH Holdings has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BJ's Restaurants has a beta of 1.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.972%.

TDH Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BJ's Restaurants offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TDH Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BJ's Restaurants pays out 0.08% of its earnings as a dividend. BJ's Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TDH Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BJ's Restaurants quarterly revenues of $348M. TDH Holdings's net income of -- is lower than BJ's Restaurants's net income of $13.5M. Notably, TDH Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while BJ's Restaurants's PE ratio is 44.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TDH Holdings is 16.48x versus 0.71x for BJ's Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of -- compared to TDH Holdings's net margin of --. TDH Holdings's return on equity of -91.4% beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

TDH Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TDH Holdings has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe TDH Holdings is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

TDH Holdings has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TDH Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TDH Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TDH Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. TDH Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, TDH Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TDH Holdings is 16.48x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum China Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to TDH Holdings's net margin of 9.8%. TDH Holdings's return on equity of -91.4% beat Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 14.02%.

TDH Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yum China Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $58.30 which suggests that it could grow by 36.27%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than TDH Holdings, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than TDH Holdings.

TDH Holdings has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.059%.

TDH Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum China Holdings offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. TDH Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TDH Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. TDH Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Yum China Holdings's net income of $292M. Notably, TDH Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.46x while Yum China Holdings's PE ratio is 17.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TDH Holdings is 16.48x versus 1.45x for Yum China Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.