PBPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Giant Group has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Potbelly's net margin of --. Potbelly's return on equity of 139.56% beat Giant Group's return on equity of --.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.59%. On the other hand Giant Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than Giant Group, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than Giant Group.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Group has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.334%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $115.1M, which are larger than Giant Group quarterly revenues of --. Potbelly's net income of $3.7M is higher than Giant Group's net income of --. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Giant Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.60x versus -- for Giant Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noodles & has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Potbelly's net margin of -5.5%. Potbelly's return on equity of 139.56% beat Noodles &'s return on equity of -171.96%.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.59%. On the other hand Noodles & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 391%. Given that Noodles & has higher upside potential than Potbelly, analysts believe Noodles & is more attractive than Potbelly.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noodles & has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.318%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noodles & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noodles & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $115.1M, which are smaller than Noodles & quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Potbelly's net income of $3.7M is higher than Noodles &'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Noodles &'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.60x versus 0.06x for Noodles &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Potbelly's net margin of -12%. Potbelly's return on equity of 139.56% beat Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6%.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.59%. On the other hand Sweetgreen has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could grow by 28.51%. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than Sweetgreen, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than Sweetgreen.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $115.1M, which are smaller than Sweetgreen quarterly revenues of $173.4M. Potbelly's net income of $3.7M is higher than Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Sweetgreen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.60x versus 5.49x for Sweetgreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Potbelly's net margin of 15.84%. Potbelly's return on equity of 139.56% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Potbelly has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.59%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $342.78 which suggests that it could grow by 27.34%. Given that Potbelly has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Potbelly is more attractive than Wingstop.

Potbelly has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.483%.

Potbelly has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Potbelly pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Potbelly quarterly revenues are $115.1M, which are smaller than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $162.5M. Potbelly's net income of $3.7M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Potbelly's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.41x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 83.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Potbelly is 0.60x versus 14.22x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.