NVVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoZone has a net margin of -91.19% compared to Nuvve Holding's net margin of 13.2%. Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26% beat AutoZone's return on equity of --.

Nuvve Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30149.86%. On the other hand AutoZone has an analysts' consensus of $3,610.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.38%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than AutoZone.

Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.819%.

Nuvve Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoZone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuvve Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoZone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than AutoZone quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M is lower than AutoZone's net income of $564.9M. Notably, Nuvve Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AutoZone's PE ratio is 21.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuvve Holding is 0.32x versus 3.07x for AutoZone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of -91.19% compared to Nuvve Holding's net margin of 15.25%. Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26% beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

Nuvve Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30149.86%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,136.09 which suggests that it could grow by 5.38%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than O'Reilly Automotive, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than O'Reilly Automotive.

Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.381%.

Nuvve Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuvve Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $665.5M. Notably, Nuvve Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 29.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuvve Holding is 0.32x versus 4.34x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarParts.com has a net margin of -91.19% compared to Nuvve Holding's net margin of -6.92%. Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26% beat CarParts.com's return on equity of -28.91%.

Nuvve Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30149.86%. On the other hand CarParts.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.94%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than CarParts.com, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than CarParts.com.

Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarParts.com has a beta of 2.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.676%.

Nuvve Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarParts.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuvve Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarParts.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than CarParts.com quarterly revenues of $144.8M. Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M is higher than CarParts.com's net income of -$10M. Notably, Nuvve Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarParts.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuvve Holding is 0.32x versus 0.09x for CarParts.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

QuantumScape has a net margin of -91.19% compared to Nuvve Holding's net margin of --. Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26% beat QuantumScape's return on equity of --.

Nuvve Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 30149.86%. On the other hand QuantumScape has an analysts' consensus of $6.53 which suggests that it could grow by 0.07%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than QuantumScape.

Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nuvve Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. QuantumScape offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuvve Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. QuantumScape pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are larger than QuantumScape quarterly revenues of --. Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M is higher than QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M. Notably, Nuvve Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while QuantumScape's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuvve Holding is 0.32x versus -- for QuantumScape. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.