AZO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GameStop has a net margin of 13.2% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 2.02%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat GameStop's return on equity of 2.41%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,610.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.38%. On the other hand GameStop has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -67.89%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than GameStop, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than GameStop.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GameStop has a beta of -0.099, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.872%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GameStop offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GameStop pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than GameStop quarterly revenues of $860.3M. AutoZone's net income of $564.9M is higher than GameStop's net income of $17.4M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while GameStop's PE ratio is 183.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.07x versus 2.58x for GameStop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuvve Holding has a net margin of 13.2% compared to AutoZone's net margin of -91.19%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,610.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.38%. On the other hand Nuvve Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29574.47%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuvve Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuvve Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues of $1.8M. AutoZone's net income of $564.9M is higher than Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while Nuvve Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.07x versus 0.33x for Nuvve Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of 13.2% compared to AutoZone's net margin of 15.25%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,610.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.38%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,136.09 which suggests that it could grow by 4.1%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than O'Reilly Automotive, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than O'Reilly Automotive.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.381%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.4B. AutoZone's net income of $564.9M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $665.5M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 30.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.07x versus 4.39x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarParts.com has a net margin of 13.2% compared to AutoZone's net margin of -6.92%. AutoZone's return on equity of -- beat CarParts.com's return on equity of -28.91%.

AutoZone has a consensus price target of $3,610.22, signalling upside risk potential of 11.38%. On the other hand CarParts.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.94%. Given that CarParts.com has higher upside potential than AutoZone, analysts believe CarParts.com is more attractive than AutoZone.

AutoZone has a beta of 0.712, which suggesting that the stock is 28.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarParts.com has a beta of 2.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.676%.

AutoZone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarParts.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AutoZone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarParts.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AutoZone quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than CarParts.com quarterly revenues of $144.8M. AutoZone's net income of $564.9M is higher than CarParts.com's net income of -$10M. Notably, AutoZone's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.67x while CarParts.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AutoZone is 3.07x versus 0.09x for CarParts.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.