MNRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crocs has a net margin of -7.21% compared to Monro's net margin of 17.08%. Monro's return on equity of -0.8% beat Crocs's return on equity of 54.54%.

Monro has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.35%. On the other hand Crocs has an analysts' consensus of $127.47 which suggests that it could grow by 22.67%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Monro.

Monro has a beta of 0.953, which suggesting that the stock is 4.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crocs has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.664%.

Monro has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Crocs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monro pays -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Crocs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monro quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Crocs quarterly revenues of $937.3M. Monro's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Crocs's net income of $160.1M. Notably, Monro's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Crocs's PE ratio is 6.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monro is 0.41x versus 1.49x for Crocs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -7.21% compared to Monro's net margin of -2.54%. Monro's return on equity of -0.8% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Monro has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.35%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 203.03%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Monro.

Monro has a beta of 0.953, which suggesting that the stock is 4.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.928, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.831%.

Monro has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monro pays -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monro quarterly revenues are $295M, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Monro's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Monro's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monro is 0.41x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorman Products has a net margin of -7.21% compared to Monro's net margin of 11.33%. Monro's return on equity of -0.8% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

Monro has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.35%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 13.02%. Given that Monro has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Monro is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Monro has a beta of 0.953, which suggesting that the stock is 4.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.306%.

Monro has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monro pays -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monro quarterly revenues are $295M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. Monro's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, Monro's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 18.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monro is 0.41x versus 1.93x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -7.21% compared to Monro's net margin of -3528.43%. Monro's return on equity of -0.8% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Monro has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.35%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.22%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Monro.

Monro has a beta of 0.953, which suggesting that the stock is 4.745% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Monro has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.05%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monro pays -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monro quarterly revenues are $295M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Monro's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Monro's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.17x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monro is 0.41x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.