MCFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats has a net margin of -7.87% compared to MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net margin of -2.94%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -1.88% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -14.12%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.13%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than MasterCraft Boat Holdings, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than MasterCraft Boat Holdings.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.304%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues are $65.4M, which are smaller than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $171.6M. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Malibu Boats's net income of -$5M. Notably, MasterCraft Boat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.93x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterCraft Boat Holdings is 0.96x versus 1.00x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Products has a net margin of -7.87% compared to MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net margin of 6.83%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -1.88% beat Marine Products's return on equity of 13.37%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand Marine Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.8%. Given that MasterCraft Boat Holdings has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe MasterCraft Boat Holdings is more attractive than Marine Products.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Products has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.976%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marine Products offers a yield of 6.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products pays out 46.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues are $65.4M, which are larger than Marine Products quarterly revenues of $49.9M. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Marine Products's net income of $3.4M. Notably, MasterCraft Boat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.93x while Marine Products's PE ratio is 17.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterCraft Boat Holdings is 0.96x versus 1.18x for Marine Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion Energy Systems has a net margin of -7.87% compared to MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net margin of -18.72%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -1.88% beat Orion Energy Systems's return on equity of -39.86%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand Orion Energy Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 220.51%. Given that Orion Energy Systems has higher upside potential than MasterCraft Boat Holdings, analysts believe Orion Energy Systems is more attractive than MasterCraft Boat Holdings.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion Energy Systems has a beta of 1.335, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.487%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion Energy Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion Energy Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues are $65.4M, which are larger than Orion Energy Systems quarterly revenues of $19.4M. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Orion Energy Systems's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, MasterCraft Boat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.93x while Orion Energy Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterCraft Boat Holdings is 0.96x versus 0.28x for Orion Energy Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Lighting Group has a net margin of -7.87% compared to MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net margin of -223.31%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -1.88% beat US Lighting Group's return on equity of --.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.86%. On the other hand US Lighting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MasterCraft Boat Holdings has higher upside potential than US Lighting Group, analysts believe MasterCraft Boat Holdings is more attractive than US Lighting Group.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.645, which suggesting that the stock is 64.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Lighting Group has a beta of 2.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.255%.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Lighting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Lighting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues are $65.4M, which are larger than US Lighting Group quarterly revenues of $151.8K. MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of -$5.1M is lower than US Lighting Group's net income of -$339K. Notably, MasterCraft Boat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.93x while US Lighting Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MasterCraft Boat Holdings is 0.96x versus 0.40x for US Lighting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.