LFUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avnet has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of 1.65%. Littelfuse's return on equity of 3.85% beat Avnet's return on equity of 6.42%.

Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $272.19, signalling upside risk potential of 49.3%. On the other hand Avnet has an analysts' consensus of $51.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6%. Given that Littelfuse has higher upside potential than Avnet, analysts believe Littelfuse is more attractive than Avnet.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avnet has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.378%.

Littelfuse has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Avnet offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Littelfuse pays 66.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet pays out 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Littelfuse quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are smaller than Avnet quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Littelfuse's net income of $43.6M is lower than Avnet's net income of $87.9M. Notably, Littelfuse's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.20x while Avnet's PE ratio is 13.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse is 2.06x versus 0.20x for Avnet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EACO has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of 6.75%. Littelfuse's return on equity of 3.85% beat EACO's return on equity of 17.08%.

Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $272.19, signalling upside risk potential of 49.3%. On the other hand EACO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Littelfuse has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Littelfuse is more attractive than EACO.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EACO has a beta of 0.083, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.691%.

Littelfuse has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. EACO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Littelfuse pays 66.93% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO pays out 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Littelfuse quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are larger than EACO quarterly revenues of $100.1M. Littelfuse's net income of $43.6M is higher than EACO's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Littelfuse's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.20x while EACO's PE ratio is 8.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse is 2.06x versus 0.49x for EACO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Richardson Electronics has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -3.82%. Littelfuse's return on equity of 3.85% beat Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -1.49%.

Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $272.19, signalling upside risk potential of 49.3%. On the other hand Richardson Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.83%. Given that Littelfuse has higher upside potential than Richardson Electronics, analysts believe Littelfuse is more attractive than Richardson Electronics.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Richardson Electronics has a beta of 1.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.82100000000001%.

Littelfuse has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Richardson Electronics offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Littelfuse pays 66.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Richardson Electronics pays out 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics's is not.

Littelfuse quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are larger than Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues of $53.8M. Littelfuse's net income of $43.6M is higher than Richardson Electronics's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Littelfuse's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.20x while Richardson Electronics's PE ratio is 270.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse is 2.06x versus 0.61x for Richardson Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taitron Components has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of 20.64%. Littelfuse's return on equity of 3.85% beat Taitron Components's return on equity of 7.88%.

Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $272.19, signalling upside risk potential of 49.3%. On the other hand Taitron Components has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Littelfuse has higher upside potential than Taitron Components, analysts believe Littelfuse is more attractive than Taitron Components.

Littelfuse has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taitron Components has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.803%.

Littelfuse has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Taitron Components offers a yield of 9.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Littelfuse pays 66.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components pays out 133.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Littelfuse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Taitron Components's is not.

Littelfuse quarterly revenues are $554.3M, which are larger than Taitron Components quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Littelfuse's net income of $43.6M is higher than Taitron Components's net income of $245K. Notably, Littelfuse's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.20x while Taitron Components's PE ratio is 14.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Littelfuse is 2.06x versus 3.14x for Taitron Components. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.