AVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EACO has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Avnet's net margin of 6.75%. Avnet's return on equity of 6.42% beat EACO's return on equity of 17.08%.

Avnet has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling downside risk potential of -1.21%. On the other hand EACO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Avnet has higher upside potential than EACO, analysts believe Avnet is more attractive than EACO.

Avnet has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.378% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EACO has a beta of 0.083, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.691%.

Avnet has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. EACO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avnet pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. EACO pays out 0.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avnet quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than EACO quarterly revenues of $100.1M. Avnet's net income of $87.9M is higher than EACO's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Avnet's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while EACO's PE ratio is 8.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avnet is 0.21x versus 0.45x for EACO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parkervision has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Avnet's net margin of --. Avnet's return on equity of 6.42% beat Parkervision's return on equity of --.

Avnet has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling downside risk potential of -1.21%. On the other hand Parkervision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2092.07%. Given that Parkervision has higher upside potential than Avnet, analysts believe Parkervision is more attractive than Avnet.

Avnet has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.378% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parkervision has a beta of 2.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.994%.

Avnet has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Parkervision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avnet pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Parkervision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avnet quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Parkervision quarterly revenues of --. Avnet's net income of $87.9M is higher than Parkervision's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Avnet's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Parkervision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avnet is 0.21x versus -- for Parkervision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Richardson Electronics has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Avnet's net margin of -3.82%. Avnet's return on equity of 6.42% beat Richardson Electronics's return on equity of -1.49%.

Avnet has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling downside risk potential of -1.21%. On the other hand Richardson Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.32%. Given that Richardson Electronics has higher upside potential than Avnet, analysts believe Richardson Electronics is more attractive than Avnet.

Avnet has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.378% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Richardson Electronics has a beta of 1.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.807%.

Avnet has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Richardson Electronics offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Avnet pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Richardson Electronics pays out 5534.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Richardson Electronics's is not.

Avnet quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Richardson Electronics quarterly revenues of $53.8M. Avnet's net income of $87.9M is higher than Richardson Electronics's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Avnet's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Richardson Electronics's PE ratio is 270.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avnet is 0.21x versus 0.67x for Richardson Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taitron Components has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Avnet's net margin of 20.64%. Avnet's return on equity of 6.42% beat Taitron Components's return on equity of 7.88%.

Avnet has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling downside risk potential of -1.21%. On the other hand Taitron Components has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Avnet has higher upside potential than Taitron Components, analysts believe Avnet is more attractive than Taitron Components.

Avnet has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.378% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taitron Components has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.803%.

Avnet has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Taitron Components offers a yield of 8.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Avnet pays 22.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Taitron Components pays out 133.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Avnet's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Taitron Components's is not.

Avnet quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Taitron Components quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Avnet's net income of $87.9M is higher than Taitron Components's net income of $245K. Notably, Avnet's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Taitron Components's PE ratio is 15.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avnet is 0.21x versus 3.29x for Taitron Components. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.