KNDI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of 3.35%. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 338.6%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.3%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.707%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.83x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.73x versus 0.18x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of 0.81%. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat H World Group's return on equity of 24.59%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 338.6%. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.64 which suggests that it could grow by 30.36%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than H World Group.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.751%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $837.1M. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is lower than H World Group's net income of $6.8M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.83x while H World Group's PE ratio is 25.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.73x versus 3.37x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of --. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat JX Luxventure Group's return on equity of 22.62%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 338.6%. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.315%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are larger than JX Luxventure Group quarterly revenues of --. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is higher than JX Luxventure Group's net income of --. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.83x while JX Luxventure Group's PE ratio is 1.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.73x versus 0.01x for JX Luxventure Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -13.73% compared to Kandi Technologies Group's net margin of -23.56%. Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54% beat Tuniu's return on equity of 7.57%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 338.6%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 85.71%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Tuniu.

Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 0.980, which suggesting that the stock is 1.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.724%.

Kandi Technologies Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Kandi Technologies Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues are $29.9M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $14.3M. Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Tuniu's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Kandi Technologies Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 58.83x while Tuniu's PE ratio is 10.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kandi Technologies Group is 0.73x versus 1.55x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.